Spring rings in accordance with DIN 127, 128, 6905, and 7980

Spring rings conforming to DIN 127, 128, 6905, and 7980 do not adequately prevent the spontaneous loosening of bolted connections and are considered technically unsuitable under current standards. The required residual spring force specified in DIN 267-26 is not achieved, which can lead to placebo effects, unreliable preload, and surface damage. Their use is no longer permitted by standards. It is recommended to replace them with modern securing elements such as the NSK washer.

  1. Definition, Purpose, and Suitability
    Spring rings are mechanical screw-locking elements that were originally designed to prevent the spontaneous loosening of screw connections under dynamic loads (e.g., vibration, shock). They do not provide a standard-compliant locking effect against self-acting loosening by rotation or loosening in accordance with the current state of the art. In particular, the required residual spring force according to DIN 267 Part 26 is not achieved, which is why their use is considered unsuitable.
  2. Design and Function
    1. Axial spring effect:
      When tightened, the spring ring is elastically deformed and generates a slight additional preload. This is intended to increase frictional engagement and delay loosening.
    2. Wedge/locking effect (Forms A/B only – DIN 127):
      The open or curved geometry creates a slight mechanical stress during relative rotational movement, which is intended to slow down back rotation. However, this effect is unreliable and cannot be validated in accordance with standards.
  3. Application Limits and Typical Uses
    Spring rings are typically used only in combination with low-strength screws (≤ property class 5.8).
    When used with A4 stainless steel, elasticity is significantly reduced, which further limits their effectiveness.
    Spring rings are not suitable for electrically conductive connections.
    When used in combination with flat washers to protect surfaces, additional settling may occur, along with an increased susceptibility to loosening.
  4. Advantages
    1. Low cost compared to modern securing elements
  5. Disadvantages
    1. No standard-compliant locking effect
    2. Risk of a placebo effect (apparent locking without technical function)
    3. Damage to mating surfaces during direct application
    4. Variation in assembly preload forces due to unstable friction conditions
    5. No protective effect in the event of overloading
    6. Combined use with flat washers leads to increased settling
  6. Standard Classification
    The standards DIN 127, DIN 128, DIN 6905, and DIN 7980 were removed in 2004 because they do not provide the required technical locking effect.
    Spring rings are no longer considered state-of-the-art.
    Their use may have liability implications—therefore, an assessment of their admissibility is required.
  7. Design Guidelines
    The use of spring rings is not recommended from a technical or legal standpoint.
    Even when used in combination with flat washers, they do not provide sufficient locking effectiveness.
    It is recommended to replace them with modern screw locking elements, e.g., NSK washers, which prevent both slackening and unscrewing and comply with DIN 267-26. NSK-E / NSK-EL are suitable for electrical applications, while the S, M, and L variants are suitable for mechanical connections.

Back to the glossary overview

Ask our AI assistant about screw locking devices